Ashton Chowning Summary Essay English 102 January 24, 2017 College is not worth the Price of Admission
Is admission worth the numerous toals that can come with college? The answer may be strenuous to understand, but the answer is without-a-doubt an important factor in a graduated students plans for the future. In fact, in the article“Are Colleges Worth the Price of Admission?”, Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus argue that the presidents of colleges would rather students obtain loans and worry about tuition fees then trying to expand the mind of a student. Hacker and Dreifus explain why the price of admission is not worth the years of debt, colleges not making students their number one priority, and students possibly not being able to use an electronic in a classroom.
To begin, there has been questions on the topic of whether price of admission worth the numerous years of debt. According to Hacker and Dreifus, “Graduating with six figures’ worth of debt is becoming increasingly common” (Hacker and Dreifus 170). In other words, Hacker and Dreifus believe that college causes colossus amounts of debt. For many Americans, to be able to send their children to college would be almost, if not as much, as their home mortgage ( Hacker and Dreifus 179). Also, if a student would have to find the funds for college themselves they would have to arrange for a number of loans. All-in-all, debt should not be a problem for a student trying to further his/her life, but it is not the only problem he/she will face.
Furthermore, another question commonly asked is if the price of admission worth colleges not making students their number one priority. In Hacker and Dreifus view, “They [college students] should become more thoughtful and interesting people. But some 64 percent of undergraduate students are enrolled in vocational majors, instead of choosing fields like philosophy, literature, or the physical science” (Hacker and Dreifus 180). In making this comment, Hacker and Dreifus believe that courses like philosophy, literature, and physical science will help students have a more optimistic future. Besides the fact that students are not taking the right classes, most professors do not make an effort to connect with their students. Colleges should push for their professors to be good teachers. All professors must be conscientious for their students. Along with debt and non-prioritizing college, students also could face professors who are anti techo-teaching.
Moreover, many students ask if the price of admission worth possibly not being able to use an electronic in a classroom. Hacker and Dreifus states, “Techno-teaching can’t rival a seminar pondering Fermat’s last theorem or King Lear, but until we improve classroom instruction, new methods should not be dismissed out of hands” (Hacker and Dreifus 183). Hacker and Dreifus point is that technology cannot have an intellectual conversation, but since the technology is their teachers should not blow it off, due to the fact that it could help the students believe that electronics can make a classroom more interactive. With the help of electronics, a teacher could conduct numerous ways to help students such as online questions, review answers, and being able to tell a student if they are wrong (Hacker and Dreifus 182). These methods could offer clues on what they could do to improve themselves. In essence, colleges are allowing that admission cause years of debt, colleges to not make students their number one priority, and the fact that some students are not able to use an electronic in a classroom. The authors have proven that colleges would rather students obtain loans and worry about tuition fees then trying to expand the mind of a student. In Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus article “Are Colleges Worth the Price of Admission?” they explain the quantity of problems a student would most likely face while attending college.
Works Cited Hacker, Andrew, and Claudia Dreifus. "Are Colleges Worth the Price of Admission." They Say I Say With Readings. By Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. Ed. Russel Durst. 2E ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 179-189. Print